Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Not A Dead Transmission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 11:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

This Is Not A Dead Transmission

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page fails the criteria for inclusion as it has not had some sort of recognition by professional organizations, such as music charts. Also the band has not been subject of a broadcast by a media network. DFS454 (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The band have been broadcast by MixIt TV in 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AidyDamage (talk • contribs) 18:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

The band also have UK press coverage and national tour dates and are, therefore, noteable.
 * Comment. hangon goes on the actual article page, not this page. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; does not meet criteria of WP:BAND. (What is Mixit TV?)  ...  disco spinster   talk  18:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; in fact, I think this article was deleted before. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - previously speedied per A7 andy (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/A Fine Impression of Dying Ants andy (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for adding that DFS454 (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. No significant coverage found - not yet notable.--Michig (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have examined all ghits for the band's name, and none appear to be in reliable sources. MixIt TV appears to be a non-notable video broadcast website, and without it having established a reputation for relevance and reliable content, it cannot really be considered a reliable source at this point.  I'm unable to find any confirmation of "UK press coverage"; if such coverage is found and turns out to be non-trivial and in a reliable source then I would of course change my !vote, but at this point it looks unlikely that it will be significant. JulesH (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.