Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Not A Theatre Company (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

This Is Not A Theatre Company
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional article requested for recreation by an editor with a clear COI following soft-deletion; no further improvements to establish the subject's notability have been made since restoration. N.b. the article's history also includes extensive contributions by editors with clear conflicts of interest. signed,Rosguill talk 20:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre and New York. signed,Rosguill talk 20:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of reliable, in depth secondary sources. Let&#39;srun (talk) 22:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete promotion with strong COI by article creator and likely by article contributors. Lacks reliable sources. Lacks evidence of notability. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.