Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Not the End (Manafest album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

This Is Not the End (Manafest album)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The majority sources present are YouTube videos that make claims about the existence of pieces of the work. There are also multiple Apple Music entries that do the same thing. press releases (jesusfreakhideout.com ) works without authors (indievisionmusic.com) and a WordPress blog entry (rockonpurpose.live) and of course the Patreon entry. There is no review for it at AllMusic, jesusfreakhideout.com, or even crossrhythms (and they review pretty much everyting that comes across their desk). It seems that the subject is lacking significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and so it fails WP:GNG. The fact that it did not chart and no other claims for WP:NALBUM can be made, I can only assume it should be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I did find a review at https://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/ThisIsNottheEnd.asp and https://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/products/Manafest/This_Is_Not_The_End/177184/ Not sure why they did not show up in their lists. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🎉  (HAPPY 2022) 00:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - sources present don't help meet the WP:GNG, no evidence anything else out there is helping either. Sergecross73   msg me  20:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sources present are unreliable, searching online didn't turn up enough coverage to justify keeping the article. QuietHere (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters. —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep, or merge with Manafest, but do not delete the article history. I have just added three items to the new "Critical reception" section of the page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as three independent reliable sources reviews have been identified and added to the article for a critical reception section so WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge with Manafest. Not enough coverage to warrant an independent article.  Tkbrett  (✉) 18:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources added to the article by Jax. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per WP:HEY. Sourcing still needs improvement, but it should not be deleted because of that, it seems likely that it can be fixed. Mako001 (C) (T)  10:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I have to agree that iwth the two sources I found after I started the AfD and that were added, along with a third, by Jax 0677, it now meets HEY. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.