Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Romantic Tragedy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

This Romantic Tragedy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This clearly needs a new AfD as they have now ended and the best my searches found was this and this. Pinging, , , , and. SwisterTwister  talk  07:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 24.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - self-published sources, non-notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 07:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 03:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable, self-published and primary sources and article appears to be promotional rather than encyclopedic. This page was earlier deleted on 27 Oct 2010. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  07:26, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Album Reborn charted at #26 in the Billboard Heatseekers Charts, view here. --Goroth (talk) 11:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete From the last AfD it seems to be determined that charting on Billboard Heatseekers does not mean probable notability, plus it was only for one week. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 20:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - and even if the one album appeared on a national music chart, that only means the group may be notable. Nothing on the search engines to show that they meet WP:GNG, and imho they don't pass WP:NMUSIC.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.