Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Town's Disaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. Nominator never finished the process, and consensus is that albums by notable bands are themselves notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

This Town's Disaster
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No Reason Given
 * Keep. The editor who nominated this page failed to create a discussion page, and I didn't want to just remove the warning from the page, so I went ahead and created the discussion page myself. Nonetheless, this article meets the criteria of WP:Music. It is a notable release from a notable band that has gained substantial coverage from reliable, third-party publications, as is stated in the article. This nomination seems to be in bad faith. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 19:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Improperly made discussion, no reason for deletion from nominator. Album is on a notable label and by a notable band, so I see no reason to delete. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep If Blackpool Lights is considered notable then an album by them can have an article. Notability of Blackpool Lights is a different question. Duffbeerforme (talk) 20:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.