Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Week in League


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

This Week in League

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability outside of the one ranking: can't turn up any sources on it, thus fails WP:WEB. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 22:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Significant coverage does not appear to exist in reliable sources. A high ranking on a poll on a fansite is the closest they have come to establishing notability. Winner 42 Talk to me!  07:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk   18:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to meet the WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above editors. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.