Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thisisnotashop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Thisisnotashop

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self promotion, not notable, terribly made page. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  18:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  18:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not notable. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and NCORP. Theredproject (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable --Devokewater (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. Spleodrach (talk) 07:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The Irish media coverage involves passing mentions such as here and here, as well as exhibition notes (e.g. ). The mention in this book is too brief and primary. Meeting WP:NCORP is never easy for independent art spaces and this is not exception, nor am I seeing enough assessment of lasting impact for WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 15:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.