Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Huge (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Jon Arbuckle and add indefinite full-protection. --MelanieN (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Thom Huge
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While the article contains a lot of info, the sources are in no way reliable. Most of this is cited to a personal blog on Wordpress or a YouTube video, neither of which are reliable sources. The person in question is only passingly notable at best, with only one VA role and literally nothing else, so either delete outright or revert the article to a redirect, as was consensus in the last two AFDs. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete (or Redirect) - article does not support WP:ENTERTAINER criteria nor provide reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Jon Arbuckle and protection. 2 AfDs have resulted in a redirect consensus.  Both were undone by IPs. &#8213;  Padenton &#124;&#9993;  14:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Why is this going back through the AfD process rather than correct it to the previous redirect status? Just wondering.--Rpclod (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that it's probably because the article has more content and sourcing than it did at its 2008 and 2012 AfDs. I have no true opinion on the article's notability (although offhand I think that it'll likely end in another redirect), but a third and final AfD would probably be a good enough idea given the additional material and sources. From what I can see he's only done one voice (Jon). He's done some other work and I found some mention of him in Highbeam, but so far I don't really see anything overwhelmingly huge. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That is exactly why I re-sent it to AFD, since this version is significantly different from prior versions and I felt a new discussion was in order. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Jon Arbuckle and protect I remember this from two years ago, seems odd we're back here for the second AfD since then. As I said then the actor is almost notable but their body of work is too insubstantial even with the better referencing (which is incredibly weak nonetheless). To prevent a fifth AfD I feel like it'll need to be protected because I doubt the vested interest wanting to make this article exist will stop. tutterMouse (talk) 18:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. tutterMouse (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.