Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas & Friends magazines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Thomas and Friends. Any merges can be discussed on the talkpage, Overall consensus is to Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends magazines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced article about... apparently numerous different magazines. I am unable to find any reliable sources discussing these magazines individually or as a group. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  17:14, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Merge to the article about Thomas and Friends, as it seems someone from the YouTube Thomas Club (*Insert blacklisted Encyclopedia Dramatica entry here*) who doesn't understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines decided to create this, LOL. But in all seriousness, the magazines do exist, but no significant coverage can be found about them. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 02:10, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Thomas and Friends as there's nothing else convincing for an article. SwisterTwister   talk  21:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Thomas and Friends - clear WP:FANCRUFT. Blythwood (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.