Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Antion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Thomas Antion

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

seems like an advertising article. fails wp:bio. Theserialcomma (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * delete nothing notable and blatantly an advert.(Lihaas (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC));
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete A few of the references are non-trivial - mostly about his earlier company, Prankmasters - and there is one reference that cites his book as a best seller in the narrow genre of paperback business books. Overall, though, it doesn't add up to much in the way of notability. --MelanieN (talk) 15:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.