Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Arun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted due to no claim of importance Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Thomas Arun

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The supposed source is copied together from Wikipedia articles and is identical to a blog of the Wikiuser who started the article. Another version of the article was already deleted twice under the name Arun Thomas. Does not fulfil the general notability guideline. Hekerui (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and Salt Completly fails WP:BIO and with no sources. scope_creep (talk) 20:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  19:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. Can't really say that the claim of "famous for namjak samaram" is an assertion of importance. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  19:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Falls under A7 criteria, doesn't even make any statements which would suggest notability. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability not asserted or sourced. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity piece.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.