Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bistritz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Thomas Bistritz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not have any notability. Most of the sources are from a non-notable, defunct website he used to be editor-in-chief of, and the others aren't much better. He was nominated for a local award once, again in relation to the defunct website, and then wrote a book that didn't get press coverage. In a WP:BEFORE search, there's a blog with an interview, so not considered a RS, and then a NY Sun article where he once held a party on a subway car. Not enough to pass GNG. Kbabej (talk) 21:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of citation of notability. The only sources are self-referential and/or generic links (such as the Amazon.com link for the book, since there don't appear to be any actual reviews or coverage of the book). -Markeer 01:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Lack of significance in sources independent of the subject. lorstaking 02:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable blogger and journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a denizen of the C-List gay life in NYC and Fire Island, I can attest that he and his blog are absolutely run of the mill. I never heard of him, it, or them. Bearian (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks notability, credible sourcing Lorelai1335 (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Lorelai1335


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.