Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bushell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  01:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thomas Bushell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No particular claim of notability made. There were lots of convicts transported to Australia, and I'm not sure what makes Bushell special. Bazonka (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep A fascinating article, based on a reliable source. But what about notability? I thought I was going to have to argue that one source is enough and the WP:GNG guidelines are inappropriate in cases like this. However, to my delight, I have found a good-looking online source, citing Margaret Brown's article, but giving other references and providing more information. When I have time I'll edit this in. How was he special? He was transported and then hanged for murder and is still being written about 150 years later. Thincat (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * He wasn't hanged for murder but for attacking a prison officer. Thincat (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep — See also . It discusses Brown's coverage, which appears already in the article. JFHJr (㊟) 23:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Interesting article for one of colonies most incorrigible prisoners.Hughesdarren (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. A historic figure of academic interest. Sometimes I wonder if this is an encyclopedia or a compendium of biographical material on flash-in-the-pan 21st-century celebrities and porn stars, of whom there are also "lots" but few of whom seem to encounter this level of scrutiny regarding what makes them "special." --86.40.192.222 (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- The fact that he has been the subject of an academic study seems to make the article worth having. HOwever apart from that he was clearly NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- An interesting subject is not necessarily a notable subject, and this is being confused here. Also, the academic study on Bushell seems to be little more than a case study on a convict - I don't know why out of all the convicts Bushell was chosen for this study but it could have been a random selection. In any case, I'm not sure that one study meets WP:SIGCOV. Bazonka (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.