Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Connors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete by Anthony.bradbury. Lenticel ( talk ) 23:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Connors

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax... no citations provided, and no further information available via Google... One citation was provided, but it was a question on Yahoo! Answers in which the answer cited this article... Adolphus79 (talk) 14:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom. Notability is not verifiable. Dzhugashvili (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. HollyHuntaway (talk) 14:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Likely hoax, absolutely no evidence that the claims of the article are true. Searching for "Thomas Connors" wax paper returns a single hit, this article.  Whether hoax or not, claims have no evidence to back them up so Delete.  Theseeker4 (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 *  Delete as hoax/unsourced. Possibly consider redirecting to Stompin' Tom Connors as a possible search term (Tom Connors already redirects there). 23skidoo (talk) 17:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and article on Wax paper needs cleanup (linked to this article) Collect (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - done... how excellent, the reference on Wax paper (the Reynolds company website) makes no mention of Mr. Connors either... LOL - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.