Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Cook (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Thomas Cook AG. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 01:38Z 

Thomas Cook (company)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has been copied from a different Wikipedia article: Thomas_Cook. The original page provides better context for the article, so a seperate article isn't needed. In addition, there is a third article that covers the company: Thomas Cook AG, not to mention a disambig pages that covers the different arms of the company: Thomas_Cook_%28disambiguation%29 Ozzykhan 19:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like this was an abandoned attempt to do a breakaway article from the main Thomas Cook piece. Delete as duplication and not really necessary as a separate article. 23skidoo 20:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Thomas Cook AG. There was really no need to take this to AfD - just be bold in merging unnecessary articles. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  20:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost entirely redundant to Thomas Cook.  A merge has not been performed yet, so redirecting per GFDL is unnecessary.  However, the two versions differ with respect to the last sentence (there may be other differences that I didn't notice), so a quick/selective merge may be in order. -- Black Falcon 08:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.