Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Crowley (soldier)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Thomas Crowley (soldier)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N and WP:NBIO (only mentioned in Croatian diaspora websites and receives a passing mention in a single book). Half of it is written in a foreign language. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - As the nom notes, the subject doesn't appear to meet WP:NSOLDIER (in that major isn't a particularly high rank, and the Order of Petar Zrinski and Fran Krsto Frankopan is not Croatia's highest military award for valour). However, as far as I can tell, the subject meets WP:GNG. In that there is substantial coverage of the subject in relevant news sources. Including three articles in which the subject is the primary subject published by what we state to be Croatia's "leading media" outlet, 24sata. And several about or relating to the subject published in the Večernji list daily. And at least a few pieces broadcast by Croatia's main national (state?) broadcaster Hrvatska radiotelevizija. While some of these Croatian language are at least a little jingoistic, and English language sources thin on the ground, based on a WP:BEFORE review, it seems to me that GNG/SIGCOV is met. Mine is a "keep" recommendation... Guliolopez (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.