Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Darnell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 23:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Darnell


notability. No signifigant contributions to the discipline Thamiel 23:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep He's well established. scope_creep 00:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * And we are to know this how? Please cite sources to demonstrate that this artist satisfies the Criteria for inclusion of biographies. Uncle G 00:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete A Google search shows evidence of exhibitions in Spain and New York City, but I need more to demonstrate that the subject is either "widely recognized" or "likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field" (per WP:BIO). Give me a review in a reputable art periodical or textbook, and I'll consider WP:BIO and WP:V satisfied. Caknuck 01:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I couldn't find any reviews, but he's had at least 50 international exhibitions in these countries - England, Spain, France, Hong Kong, Italy, USA, Switzerland and Argentina.  oops forgot my sig Roaming27 00:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I'm close to agreeing with Roaming27 based on the number of exhibitions. However, I also couldn't find any reviews or independant coverage (other than a reference on Darnell's Blanccanvas site that he had been reviewed by a Spanish art critic).  Without any reviews or independent coverage I don't know how you go about verifying the information in the article. -Kubigula (ave) 23:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If his exhibitions made him notable then there would be independent reviews of his exhibitions. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 14:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.