Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Bullard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Thomas E. Bullard

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BIO. Not known of outside the UFO community. As an academic, definitely fails WP:PROF. See also WP:FRINGE. jps (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: poorly sourced BLP, lacking any third party sourcing. find does not appear to turn up any sources that "address the subject directly in detail". HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sourcing found about this person. --MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.