Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Erl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Thomas Erl

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Obvious advertising / self-promotion. Non-notability Rexreed (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 07:50, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 02:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: relisting per . Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 02:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Request to Keep: The author is a well known name in the field of Service Oriented Architecture (SOA). He has laid down the foundation for SOA Principles and related Patterns in his books SOA Principles of Service Design and SOA Design Pattens. Thomas has published 7 books and many more are in the pipeline on SOA & Cloud Computing subjects. He is also the Prentice Hall Series Editor for SOA Books. Apart from authoring books, Thomas is a key speaker at SOA Symposium events. Edited by Sanjay (talk) 06:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unable to find any independent coverage. Bongo  matic  06:14, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.