Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas F. Collura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 05:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Thomas F. Collura

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable psychologist and neuroscientist. It appears to be mainly promotional. All of the sources are written by him, and the company that he's the president of doesn't even have an article. Poydoo can talk and edit 00:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Poydoo can talk and edit 00:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Poydoo can talk and edit 00:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, it seems that he is a well-published scholar, the claims in the article need to be verified, but I'd hold on deleting it. Kolma8 (talk) 12:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - there are zero independent reliable sources in the article about this person, in direct violation of WP:BLP. Many hits on Google are not to this person, but to Tom Collura, a marginally notable lawyer from Albany, New York, and Mary Collura, who has run for office and might be a relative. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a resume, not an article.  FalconK (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete articles need to reference secondary sources, not just list the works of the subject to show that they have published. We need material about the subject of an article, not just a list of the articles they have written.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.