Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas F. DiLullo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Thomas F. DiLullo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The provided sources don't discuss the subject in detail also, the ESPN and USA today pieces have basically the same content, the subject does not have WP:SIGCOV and the coverage is all related to his cases and clients. A WP:BEFORE search also did not bring up more coverage of the subject. May not pass WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. Bingo bro  (Chat)  09:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of in-depth coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG. Knox490 (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Bingo bro   (Chat)  09:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. per nom --Devokewater @  15:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:51, 6 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - All of the sources here are about one specific case, with much focus on his client and very little on DiLullo himself. A Google search turns up nothing more that would be the evidence to support a claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete being a person the media in your local area turns to for comments is not a sign of notability, it needs to be media that is clearly reaching out to you as a leading expert on a specific subject in a very large area. The cases mentioned here are not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.