Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Huebl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Thomas Huebl

 * – ( View AfD View log )



Spiritual teacher of marginal notability with conflict of interest issues. This article has been moved by its creator, User:Eyesbro, from draft space to article space three times, and has been moved back to draft space by two reviewers, User:Timtrent and User:CambridgeBayWeather. Each time, the article has been moved to draft space by the author, not reviewed. Moving the article to draft space a third time would be slow-motion move-warring.

This article was proposed for deletion on 10 November 2020, and the article author removed the deletion proposal, which is their right.

Does User:Eyesbro have any connection with Thomas Huebl? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not LinkedIn]] and there's nothing here that would pass WP:NPROF, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ANYBIO. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: there's simply no evidence of either notability or significant coverage. The Reuters article only mentions him in "Further reading" at the bottom, where it links to his own YouTube channel. The other references are either to sites connected with Hübl, or are interviews with him so aren't independent of the subject. [[WP:NOTLINKEDIN|
 * Delete - fails WP:PROF and WP:SIGCOV. The sources are connected back to the subject. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.