Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas J. Farrell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 04:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Thomas J. Farrell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A stub article, which does not indicate any kind of notablity. Appears to fail ANYBIO and WP:PROF Steve Quinn (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my nomination. Subject is deemed sufficiently notable. Admin please close this nomination if don't get back to it. Steve Quinn (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, the book he edited on Bakhtin is cited all over the place and widely reviewed, and Sources and Analogues is, as every Chaucerian knows, an essential piece of scholarship. Keep. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Drmies. The scholarship is significant and makes him notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment --  Drmies is correct. After checking out Google Scholar with the book title - there are plenty of reviews. In other words, his works have made a significant impact (in his field). I am withdrawing my nomination. I don't have time to do a self-close right now - so if anyone wishes to feel free. I will try to do it later. Steve Quinn (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.