Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas J. Moran (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Please note that the infobox in the article on the university lists him as chancellor, not vice-chancellor as the (sole) source in this article indicates. Article is incredibly short and should be urgently expanded. Note that even if a subject meets WP:ACADEMIC, we cannot have an article if there are no sufficient sources to provide sourced content, regardless whether a subject is notable or not. Randykitty (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thomas J. Moran (businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NACADEMICS OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 09:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: duplicate nomination header removed. GermanJoe (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep subject of the article obviously meet WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC as Vice Chancellor of Queen's University Belfast. This nomination is so erroneous that it indicates the nominator is not in anyway familiar with WP:ACADEMIC. Nominator, please familiarize yourself with basic policies and guidelines before nominating articles for deletion. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 02:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I recommend an early closure of this debate by any passing admin or non-admin in good standing to avoid a waste of time of participating editors. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 02:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: The guy is probably notable, but the super-stub nature of the article no doubt led to this nomination. Would be nice if someone could expand it a bit, there is more sourcing available from what I can see.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:23, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.