Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas James Williams


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Thomas James Williams

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable assistant camera man Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Thomas James Williams is one of the biggest cinematographers in the northwest currently working, I'm collecting the articles now Modmaciek (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Erm, imdb only gives him 3 cinematography credits, all from 2009. He's mostly done assistant camera work. I don't know whether that makes him notable or not. But the Northwest is not exactly a haven of cinematographers...Hairhorn (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- ( X!  ·  talk )  · @922  · 21:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero awards and only one of the three cinematography credits is for a film with a reasonable number of IMDb votes (and a very low rating). Clarityfiend (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources to indicate notability. His work has been primarily as an assistant cameraman unti very recently, so this isn't surprising. -- Whpq (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of reliable sources. I could find no sources on Google News Archive to verify the information in the article. Furthermore, the external links at the bottom of this article have very little to do with the subject; instead, they are more relevant to the movies where he has been an assistant camerman. Cunard (talk) 08:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.