Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kearins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Thomas Kearins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely un-notable referee.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 13:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing to indicate notability. -  Galatz Talk  15:29, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are far more prominent referees who don't have articles due to not meeting general notability guidelines - wrestling referees don't normally receive media coverage unless they've had a high-profile career. Also, most of the edits seem to have come from three single-purpose accounts which suggests a possible conflict of interest. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 18:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems a clear case where the subject does not meet notability. Dunarc (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete it takes quite a bit for a referee to be notable, and Kearins is no where close.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 'Delete does not pass WP:GNG at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.