Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kuster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Feel free to nominate the rest of the family. Punkmorten 12:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Kuster


This article about a professor gives no reasons why he is notable but only his CV. Being a professor alone does not merit an article on Wikipedia Fil e  Éireann 20:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like your above average guy. That's just it. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 00:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I found two publications, one of which is a copy of his Ph.D. dissertation in the library of the college where he works. Someone with access to a university library could probably find some more material. Interestingly, his son Andrew Kuster already has a Wikipedia article. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete Fails WP:PROF. Also, this guy's wife, son and daughter-in-law all have articles:Judith Kuster, Andrew Kuster, Kristin Kuster. Appears to be some family-promotion going on here. I think that all these articles except possibly Kristin's are likely AFD candidates. Bwithh 04:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per above. Also has never been mentioned in a major newspaper, even a local one, ever (NewsBank). -newkai t-c 05:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and have a look at the family articles. Robertissimo 08:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not remotely notable as an academic. the other family members should go as well, except for Kristin who seems like a keep to me. Derex 10:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.