Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ladanyi

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 09:21, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Thomas Ladanyi
Seems to be for real rather than vanity, but still only gets about 90 google hits once the versions of the wiki stub are removed. This either needs deletion or proof of notability (and subsequent article expansion). Grutness|hello? 07:07, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy? Delete/Speedy Delete, as above. Strange, when I Googled it I only got 33 results, one of them the Wiki page! He seems to be a real person, but, um, not really noteworthy. Master Thief Garrett 07:11, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I should explain - I got 90 for "Thomas Ladanyi"+Constitution after getting far fewer for "Thomas A Ladanyi". Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 00:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, that makes sense now. But even so, still not noteworthy. Master Thief Garrett 01:14, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 06:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.