Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Marban (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Thomas Marban
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability since its creation. Article almost entirely made of puffery; one RS in the whole thing (PopUrls in Time). Dangerously ill-referenced for a BLP, needs serious attention to stay. Previous AFD was in 2004, abandoned as moot when creator blanked page; later speedied as A7. David Gerard (talk) 12:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed most missing/non-primary references, removed peacocks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.0.229.28 (talk) 07:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Replacing a link to a press release with a link to a different copy of the same press release probably doesn't solve the problems - David Gerard (talk) 11:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.