Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas More Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Thomas More Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has references from only the website of the institution. No reference from independent source. Fails to meet the WP:GNG. Sourov0000 (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. A higher education institution of long standing; multiple reliable sources to improve the article are apparent in a simple GNews search. WP:BEFORE. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:04, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. gNews. WP:BEFORE failure. The nominator is reminded that, with the exception of BLPs, references are not required to be in the article, only that they exist. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - the sources that are available are sufficient to meet WP:GNG. It educates to degree level and is clearly a long-standing and significant institution. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.