Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas O'Loughlin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Thomas O'Loughlin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Doesn't appear to be the subject of multiple reliable, third party sources, though some of his books could be borderline notable so I'm unsure on this. HJ Mitchell |  fancy a chat?   15:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep reluctantly. I sourced the basics of what's in the article, and removed the rest of it. Despite no article about this individual, he's written and published sufficient material to pass my personal threshold. Chutznik (talk) 19:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 05:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Easy keep per WP:PROF: full professor at a major university, associate at research think tank, published more than the average professor, lots of Google scholar hits, and has lots of books at WorldCat. Bearian (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Bearian, clearly passes the professor test. Wine Guy   Talk  07:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.