Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas P. Dooley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Thomas P. Dooley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the general notability guideline soundly. Possibly a WP:AUTOBIO. May meet the subject-specific guideline for academics under criterion 3, as a Postdoctoral Fellow of the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation and/or criterion 5, as an endowed chair at Southern Research Institute. However, I'm not sure whether the Whitney Foundation counts as "a major scholarly society for which Fellowship is a highly selective honor", nor whether the SRI counts as "a major institution of higher education and research".  Tera TIX  10:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC) Bad nomination.  Tera TIX  05:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Satisfies WP:PROF, with a GScholar h-index of 30, a total of more than three thousand citations there, one paper with 300+ cites and another five with 100+ cites: . James500 (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.