Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Papadopoulos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Papadopoulos

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Difficult to verify the assertions, and this one is marginal notable. NonvocalScream (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe I looked in the wrongs spots, but I failed to find coverage of the article's subject in a reliable, secondary source (or in a primary source, for that matter). fails WP:BIO. Lazulilasher (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, very nearly a speedy as a non-notable biography. The closest thing I see here to an assertion of notability is that he's the "author of a number of legal articles", and that doesn't really say much - plenty of people have written and published papers, but relatively few of them are well-known for having done so, and Mr. Papadopoulos doesn't appear to be one of them. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability at all. KleenupKrew (talk) 23:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The notability depends on the articles, the number and importance. It cant be assumed from a Wikipedia bio like this that the work either is or is not significant, and I wouldn't be prepared to !vote without looking for myself. Actually looking, in this case in Google Scholar, as a preliminary, I find 4 or 5. (there are 3 as ssrn) There's an alternate form of the name: . Ioannis Papadopoulos - I don;'t think he's notable yet. As he apparently is 24 years old, that seems reasonable. DGG (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Author had blanked page within a day of creating article, also fails WP:BIO. Paste (talk) 19:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.