Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Personal Profile Analysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Thomas Personal Profile Analysis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not sufficiently established by independent sources - I can find a few sources mentioning it, but nothing that I would consider rising to the level of "significant coverage" required to meet the general notability guideline. Among the references, only those that are not independent of the subject actually mention it (as far as I can tell, I can't find access to every reference). The references that are independent of the subject just address general concepts such as personality analysis.

The article creator and all significant contributors are single-purpose accounts, suggesting that there may be advertising/promotion and conflict of interest issues at play here as well. Edgeweyes (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:39, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:39, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as WP:PROMO. This is actually a long-winded ad for one product dressed up as an article. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising. Bakazaka (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 04:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.