Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ranch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Ranch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An incorporated ranching operation should meet WP:NCORP to merit inclusion. No indication that this one does. BD2412 T 19:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:G11 and WP:G12 – Almost exclusively promotional for its entire existence and has shown no sign of improvement after 16 years. Furthermore, almost the entire article is plagiarized directly from the subject's own website – the article possibly having been created by the subject's owners or somebody related thereto during the Wild West that was 2005 Wikipedia. WP:BEFORE turned up nothing, though I'll concede I wasn't able to check historic newspaper sources where one would be most likely to find reliable, independent coverage about this subject should it actually exist. This one really slipped through the cracks.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  19:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: per G11 (Advertising), G12 is not opportune at a 2 sentence article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MB 19:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's old? Don't care. AdoTang (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete absolutely no claim to notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 00:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The fact that this has existed on WP for so long is disappointing. Good on nominator for catching. No notability. —Kbabej (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.