Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Rathnam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No copyvio, but a complete copy of http://thomasrathnam.wikia.com/wiki/Thomas_Rathnam_Wiki, including errors. This article is four days old, while the article on enwp is launched today (1 September). Even the "source" looks like copy and paste work from another, not identified page. Google Cache shows that this article was made by the subject himself on simpel-WP, so author here can be a sockpuppet of the subject to hide his selfpromo. Night of the Big Wind talk  02:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Despite three previous deletions, this self-promoter has still not got the idea of reliable sources. &mdash; RHaworth 12:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, no reliable sources to be found. With all the films currently in the pipeline, he may have the sources needed in the future, but not today. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've also nominated the movie for deletion, and that discussion is taking place at Articles for deletion/Banna banna da Loka. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.