Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Razell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Kent county cricketers to 1842. If there is disagreement on the correct redirect target, editors can discuss this on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Thomas Razell

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSCRIT #5. Prod was removed after an editor found coverage in Carlaw's series of biographies, but according to them it is brief, meaning it is not the required WP:SIGCOV. BilledMammal (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket,  and England. Shellwood (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll get to this today I imagine. It's a shame that a note wasn't put on my talk page asking whether I'd had time to review this before it came to AfD - as the editor who removed the PROD. At the very, very worst there are clear and obvious redirect targets, but articles with similar sourcing have been closed as keep recently. I'll see what else I can find. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is probably a redirect - the details are too sketchy and there are too many possibilities for us to say for certain which Thomas Razell (or Razzell or Wrassell) he is. There are two possible targets that make sense: List of Kent county cricketers to 1842 or List of English cricketers (1787–1825). Given that he only played once for Kent, the latter might make more sense here - the biographical sketch can be longer on the former, but it's less of an obvious place to look for someone who played for Epsom as well. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per BST, and WP:PRESERVE, etc. Note that the nom had recently suggested a redirect for similar cases last month.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 13:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Kent county cricketers to 1842 per BST, I've not found much in a simple search and given BST's knowledge on Kent cricket, if he can't find much I doubt there's too much there. Redirect a suitable WP:ATD and probably should have been BOLDly done to save the AfD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.