Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Regout International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Thomas Regout International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphaned, seems to read like an advert and also has no real references of this existing apart from the company website BSOleader (talk) 12:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete this entirely unsourced article as it stands, with no prejudice against re-creation if sources can be found.  A  Train ''talk 08:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  08:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: An unreferenced WP:SPA article on a manufacturing firm. The nl.wikipedia has articles on individuals in the founding family but not on the firm itself, despite its longevity. My searches are finding routine announcements regarding products, patents, etc., but not the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate notability by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.