Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Sach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Per A7: Subject might exist but there is no indication whatsoever to indicate any inclusion-worthiness.  So Why  10:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Sach

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Suspected hoax, in any case doesn't pass the general notability guideline (notability is not inherited). Since his father met his current wife in 2002-2003, that would make the subject 6 years old at best. Would have speedied but hoaxes are excluded. MLauba (talk) 09:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Obvious hoaxes can be speedied under G3, and people with no real assertion of importance under A7. I think, based on nominator's research, either criterion can apply. Ray  Talk 09:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Moving to Speedy - obvious hoax, user contribs are telltale. MLauba (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.