Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Spring II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Hoax (as others) seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  19:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Spring II

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks multiple reliable sources. Not notable. Probable hoax Kittybrewster  &#9742;  20:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge to Spring family. Thomas is verifiable in Burke's, but probably not independently notable. Choess (talk) 03:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. I trust Choess's assertion that there is  evidence that the man existed, but there is no evidence of his notability nor of the facts of his career.  Merger retains the edit history, ready for restoration by any editor: why would we want to do that, when all the text is the work of a demonstrable hoaxer? -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.