Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Suozzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep.  Syn  ergy 08:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Thomas Suozzi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

local politician, fails WP:BIO, WP:POLITICIAN


 * This politician passes WP:GNG hands down. I had previously closed this article per WP:SNOW as I must say this is probably the most obviously notable subject I have ever seen at AFD, but I was reverted and labeled a vandal by the nominator. Anyways rather than edit war, super strong keep per my previous closing rationale. - Icewedge (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep for reasons stated above. I'm not sure if I agree with Icewedge's closing, but it clearly wasn't vandalism. JamesMLane t c 03:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   —JamesMLane t c 03:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep If this is "the most obviously notable subject" that Icewedge has ever seen at AFD, he should spend more time here. This subject appears to have several instances of substantial coverage in reliable and independent sources. This is not to say that every "county executive" or equivalent in the world has any inherent notability. Edison2 (talk) 04:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant elected position.  Obviously notable. Edward321 (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in New York Magazine, Governing Magazine, The New York Times, and on National Public Radio meets Notability_(people). Kristen Eriksen (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in New York Magazine, Governing Magazine, The New York Times, and on National Public Radio meets Notability_(people). Kristen Eriksen (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.