Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Tomczyk - 2nd nomination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as a repost of article in the same form.Blnguyen | rant-line 03:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Thomas Tomczyk
This was nominated for deletion once, got deleted, and then somebody recreated it. I request that we delete and then Salt. RedRollerskate 15:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, recreated material (and may be speediable under G4) & doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO criteria. Claims towards WP:BIO are not verifiably sourced and (though this is not a deletable offense) it is yet another "resume bio" that needs a complete bottom to top rewrite if it survives this AfD.--Isotope23 15:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The format of the article strongly suggests it may be a copyright violation of Who's Who in Polish America.  Even if it is not a technical violation, this appears non-notable. Ted 18:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 'NOT delete!!!!' I am the author of the article, and I strongly nominate a page for undeletion. June 18, 2006. Victoria Madison
 * Comment I know it's a bummer to have your hard work deleted, but I just don't see why this guy belongs in Wikipedia. Not everybody needs their own article.  I think my best friend is great, but that doesn't mean she belongs on Wikipedia.  However, this AfD still has three more days to get votes before the admins decide whether or not to delete it.  In order to get more votes, I'll re-list it. RedRollerskate 01:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. This is a résumé, just like the last one. Note that there's a link to Polish Wikipedia, but his article has been deleted there, too. Fan1967 01:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT - specifically, I would suggest self-promotion. Jammo (SM247) 02:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.