Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Valone (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Valone
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only assertion of notability is as director of an organisation which apparently is notable enough to have garnered an article itself.

A (brief, admittedly) web search turned up nothing that could be considered non-trivial independent coverage.

(Page was PRODded, but removed by anon IP.) Oli Filth(talk 18:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Just noticed, page was previously AfDed, but it appears to have benn re-created. Should this therefore be speedy delete? Oli Filth(talk 18:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete on procedural grounds. Yes, Oli, I believe you're right: DRV is the venue if someone wants to re-create it.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  19:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, but perhaps not speedy. The first AfD result was "delete and redirect to book", and then the book was deleted, so this page was deleted as a page dependent on a deleted page.  However, this page has less than the deleted page.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.