Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Vasquez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thomas Vasquez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with only 2 top tier fights (both losses). Fails WP:GNG with no significant independent coverage. Jakejr (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete He lacks the coverage to meet WP:GNG and he also fails to meet WP:NMMA. His amateur record is immaterial since WP:MMANOT states that amateur MMA fighters are not notable so it doesn't really matter what he did as an amateur.  We've deleted amateur MMA champions before and he isn't even that. Papaursa (talk) 02:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Conflicting Guidelines I believe this biography both meets WP:MMABIO which reads "Fought at least three (3) fights for top tier MMA organizations" while at the same time fails WP:NMMA which reads "Have fought at least three (3) professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC". I have brought this to the attention of talk:MMABIO. Kevlar (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Good catch on the guidelines they should merge a bit better. WP:NMMA trumps WP:MMABIOPeter Rehse (talk) 08:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.