Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Warren Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  17:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Warren Campbell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fringe physicist with no reliable references for his work, only material that cites him is paranormal books or blogs. Goblin Face (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Goblin Face (talk) 19:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PROF - Google scholar brought up two hits which, upon investigation proved to be a blog and a paranormal wiki. Simonm223 (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fringe researchers can be notable, but we need mainstream sources discussing their work in order to put it into a sufficiently neutral perspective. In this case we have no such sources and indeed no evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom, and because he seems to only be even remotely notable for speaking at the Monroe Institute Conference. Once. Which makes this a clear case of when WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTINHERITED also argue against notability. As pointed out above, Campbell also fails WP:PROF quite spectacularly. Jinkinson   talk to me  22:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete His TOE fails everything. --Randykitty (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. - - MrBill3 (talk) 22:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.