Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Young (academic)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED. dbenbenn | talk 00:34, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thomas Young (academic)
Article does not establish notability. jni 17:49, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy deleted as an "attempt to communicate" with this person. See Criteria for speedy deletion, article 11.  If it's Thomas Young (scientist) he should have used a ouija board instead. -- Curps 21:45, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.