Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Zabel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Thomas Zabel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. red dogsix (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 01:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 01:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 01:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 01:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable real estate developer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non notable as either an entrepreneur or "an international specialist in real estate development". The article borders on G11 with its puffed up language and self-promotion. No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.