Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas de Klerk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  17:34, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thomas de Klerk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Spammy NN autobio. A single Gnews archive hit, nor can I find any other WP:RS establishing notability. Fails WP:BIO. Tim Song (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is terrible, nothing but fluff. No references are given, and I couldn't find any in Google Books or in the Dutch National Library, and no entry in www.dbnl.org. Those are not good signs, and since there is no evidence of notability in the article, I say delete. Drmies (talk) 23:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - article fails WP:N, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". No sources are cited.  Also WP:BLP recommends immediate deletion of all unsourced statements in the biography of a living person, which in this case would require blanking the article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in google books or Dutch National Library clear dud. Himalayan   10:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this piece of self-promotion by a non-notable entity. --Lambiam 20:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.