Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas paul kling

Thomas paul kling
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Rather comical claims to fame, but at precisely zero google hits for "Thomas paul kling" this is just vanity. May add text to BJAODN though... -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 20:14, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete: I hate to reward the author, but BJAODN. It did make me laugh. Geogre 01:10, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete a similar article on Kling by a known vandal was speedied a couple days ago. last one seemed to be by a student at some Florida highschool about a teacher. Wolfman 04:11, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Patent nonsense, belongs to BJAODN. Delete - Mike Rosoft 09:24, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * By the way: what is the "pog" he has supposedly invented?
 * See Pogs. -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 13:01, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)