Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas sena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 08:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Thomas sena

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability is somewhat asserted, but I am unable to find non-trivial third-party sources. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 21:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete fails WP:GEOGRE. JuJube (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I do not see a problem with being sources. The article itself gives two 3rd party independent sources of presumed reliability, one of which has the subject as a cover story, thus showing substantial coverage by any reasonable standard. The question is whether the notability is local--but this seems a major trade magazine of national coverage--so, to my considerable surprise, unlike almost all similar articles, this one actually does meet WP:N. And Georgre's law asserts only a correlation with miscapitalization of the subject's name, not a proof of it an in fact, here's a counterexample to it. DGG (talk) 08:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a vanity article that has no possibility of being supported by reliable sources. • Freechild   'sup?   01:45, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This not only has the possibility of being supported by reliable sources - that support has already been demonstrated. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established and badly written --Dreamspy (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ff m  15:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-advertisement for one-branch local salon.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 07:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.